Australia Fines X $465,000 for Failing to Report on Child Safety

Key Takeaways

- X Corp. fined AU$650,000 ($465,000) for violating Australia's Online Safety Act
- The company admitted it failed to answer questions about how it handles child exploitation content
- Both X and Australia's eSafety regulator agreed the fine amount was appropriate
An Australian Federal Court judge has fined X Corp. AU$650,000 ($465,000) for failing to tell the country's online safety regulator how it handles child sexual exploitation material. The Thursday ruling ends a three-year court fight that began when X ignored a mandatory transparency notice.
Justice Michael Wheelahan also ordered X to pay AU$100,000 ($71,000) of the eSafety Commissioner's legal costs within 45 days.
What X Failed to Do
In February 2023, eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant sent transparency notices to several major tech companies, including Twitter. The notices asked companies to report what steps they were taking to comply with Australia's Basic Online Safety Expectations for handling child sexual exploitation and abuse materials.
X had until March 29, 2023 to respond. It didn't provide a complete report.
X's lawyer Perry Herzfeld told the court that the noncompliance didn't continue past May 5, 2023. He described that period as "a time of change and transition for the company." Elon Musk completed his acquisition of Twitter in October 2022 and merged it with X Corp. in March 2023.
The company admitted in court that it violated Australia's Online Safety Act by failing to fully answer the questions in the transparency notice.
Why the Fine Amount
Both X and eSafety agreed the AU$650,000 penalty was appropriate. Christopher Tran, eSafety's lawyer, explained the reasoning.
“It's appropriate because X Corp. is obviously a large company and a large figure is needed to ensure that a contravention is not treated as a cost of doing business.”
— Christopher Tran, eSafety's lawyer
For context: X generated around $3 billion in revenue in 2023, down from $4.4 billion in 2022 according to various reports. A $465,000 fine represents a fraction of a percent of that figure.
The Three-Year Legal Battle
X had argued throughout the case that it wasn't obligated to answer eSafety's questions. The Full Federal Court rejected that argument in July 2024, upholding an October 2024 lower court ruling. X did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the fine.
What the Regulator Says
Inman Grant, who worked at Twitter before becoming Australia's eSafety Commissioner, said transparency from tech companies is essential for accountability.
“This is not only a key part of our work as Australia's online safety regulator, it also provides the Australian public with important information about how these companies are tackling the worst-of-the-worst content on their platforms.”
— Julie Inman Grant, eSafety Commissioner
Australia has taken an increasingly aggressive approach to regulating social media platforms. The country's Online Safety Act gives regulators power to compel companies to disclose how they handle harmful content, and to fine those who don't comply.
Another regulatory challenge facing Elon Musk's tech ventures
Pattern of Platform Friction
This isn't the first time X has clashed with Australian regulators. In 2024, eSafety ordered X to remove posts showing a bishop being stabbed during a Sydney church service. X initially refused, calling it censorship, before eventually complying.
The company has also faced regulatory pressure in Brazil, where it was briefly banned in 2024 for refusing to comply with court orders, and in the European Union under the Digital Services Act.
Logicity's Take
Frequently Asked Questions
Why was X fined in Australia?
X failed to respond to a mandatory transparency notice from Australia's eSafety Commissioner asking how the platform handles child sexual exploitation content. The company admitted it violated the Online Safety Act.
How much is the X Australia fine?
The Federal Court fined X Corp. AU$650,000 (approximately $465,000 USD). X must also pay AU$100,000 ($71,000) of the regulator's legal costs.
Did X appeal the Australian ruling?
X did fight the case for three years, arguing it wasn't obligated to respond. The Full Federal Court rejected that argument in July 2024, and both parties agreed on the fine amount.
What is Australia's eSafety Commissioner?
The eSafety Commissioner is Australia's online safety regulator. It has power to compel tech companies to report on how they handle harmful content and can issue fines for noncompliance.
Need Help Implementing This?
Source: mint
Huma Shazia
Senior AI & Tech Writer
Related Articles
Browse all
Robotaxi Companies Are Hiding How Often Humans Take the Wheel
Autonomous vehicle firms like Waymo and Tesla are under scrutiny for refusing to disclose how often remote operators step in to control their self-driving cars. A Senate investigation reveals major gaps in transparency, raising safety and accountability concerns.

Wisconsin Governor Throws a Wrench in Age Verification Plans
Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers has vetoed a bill that would have required residents to verify their age before accessing adult content online, citing concerns over privacy and data security. This move comes as several other states have already implemented similar age check requirements. The veto has significant implications for the future of online age verification.

Apple's App Store Empire Under Siege: The Battle for the Future of Tech
The long-running feud between Apple and Epic Games has reached a boiling point, with Apple preparing to take its case to the Supreme Court. The tech giant is fighting to maintain control over its App Store, while Epic Games is pushing for more freedom for developers. The outcome could have far-reaching implications for the entire tech industry.

Tesla's Remote Parking Feature: The Investigation That Didn't Quite Park Itself
The US auto safety regulators have closed their investigation into Tesla's remote parking feature, but what does this mean for the future of autonomous driving? We dive into the details of the investigation and what it reveals about the technology. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration found that crashes were rare and minor, but the investigation's closure doesn't necessarily mean the feature is completely safe.
Also Read

SpaceX Lists Grok's 'Spicy' Mode as IPO Risk Factor
SpaceX's IPO filing reveals the company faces regulatory scrutiny and potential litigation over xAI's Grok chatbot. The filing discloses ongoing investigations into allegations that Grok generated sexualized imagery of apparent minors, with $530 million set aside for potential litigation losses.

RBI Wallet Rules Could Shut Down Remittance Business
The Reserve Bank of India's April 22 draft guidelines propose severe restrictions on mobile wallets, including a Rs 25,000 monthly cap on person-to-person transfers and an 80% reduction in cash loading limits. Industry players are scrambling to convince the regulator to delay implementation by six to twelve months.

Kansas City Goes All-Apple, Buys 4,500 MacBook Neos
Kansas City Public Schools is replacing more than 30,000 Windows PCs and Chromebooks with Apple devices. The district has already purchased over 4,500 MacBook Neo laptops for students in 8th grade and above, paying $499 per unit through education pricing.