Respond.io raises $62.5M to buy rivals in the West

Key Takeaways

- Respond.io raised $62.5M Series B led by Camber Partners, growing 169% YoY to $35M ARR with a 30% profit margin
- The company plans acquisitions in North America and Europe, where it sees fastest growth despite currently earning only 20% of revenue
- CEO Salandra argues conversation-based pricing insulates the company from AI disruption that threatens per-seat SaaS competitors
Respond.io, the Kuala Lumpur-based messaging platform, has closed a $62.5 million Series B round led by Camber Partners. The company will use the capital primarily to acquire competitors in North America and Europe, regions where it currently generates just 20% of revenue but sees its fastest growth.
The round comes with numbers that stand out in the current SaaS funding environment: $35 million in annual recurring revenue, 169% year-over-year growth, and a 30% profit margin. Endeavor Catalyst and existing investors also participated. Respond.io last raised $7 million in a 2022 Series A.
What does Respond.io actually do?
The platform helps mid-sized and large B2C companies manage customer conversations across WhatsApp, Instagram, TikTok, Messenger, Telegram, WeChat, Line, and web chat. AI agents handle routine inquiries, qualify leads, and close sales without human intervention.
CEO Gerardo Salandra describes the core customer base as "high-consideration" businesses. Healthcare, automotive, retail, education, travel. Industries where people need to talk before buying.
“You don't go to a website, put your credit card, and buy a car; you chat with someone, you ask a lot of questions.”
— Gerardo Salandra, CEO of Respond.io
The sweet spot is companies with 200 to 10,000 employees. The platform processes 2 billion messages per quarter.
Why acquisitions, and why now?
Salandra has two types of targets in mind. First, bolt-on technology that fits into the existing product. Second, established teams with strong customer bases in strategic Western markets.
"Imagine how many months I can save if I find the right company that maybe already has the clients and the team," he told TechCrunch. "I can save myself six months to a year through an acquisition." He confirmed the company is already in talks with potential targets.
The geographic logic is straightforward. Respond.io currently earns 30% of revenue from APAC, 30% from Latin America, and 20% from the Middle East and Africa. North America and Western Europe together account for just 20%, but Salandra says these regions are now the company's fastest-growing segments.
"They took longer to make the change, but now they're moving very rapidly into messaging channels," he said. He expects both regions to become the company's largest within two to three years.
Can ChatGPT replace this?
The obvious question for any platform handling customer messages: what happens when AI tools get good enough that businesses plug in ChatGPT directly? Salandra's answer hinges on pricing structure and data advantage.
Unlike enterprise software competitors that charge per seat, Respond.io charges based on conversation volume. Whether a human or an AI handles the message, the customer pays the same. Per-seat competitors lose revenue when AI replaces human agents. Respond.io doesn't.
"When fewer humans use your product, they make less money," Salandra said. "But we don't charge like that."
He also points to the data flywheel. More messages mean better AI training data. Better AI attracts more customers. More customers generate more messages. The 2 billion messages per quarter create a compounding advantage that new entrants can't replicate overnight.
"Because we started so long ago and we have such a strong foundation, we can provide better AI compared to someone who just entered into the messaging space," Salandra said.
The case against legacy platforms
Salandra sees an opening against incumbents in North America and Europe. Those platforms were built around email and phone calls. Messaging came later, bolted on as an afterthought.
"The platforms that exist, they bolted on messaging as a second thought. They're very email focused, they're very call focused, but when it comes to messaging, it's an afterthought," he said.
Respond.io, founded in Hong Kong in 2017 before relocating to Malaysia in 2019, was built messaging-first. Salandra previously worked at IBM and Google before joining Runtastic, the fitness app Adidas acquired in 2015. Co-founders Hassan Ahmed serves as CTO and Iaroslav Kudritskiy as COO.
IPO ambitions, but discipline first
Despite the fresh capital, Salandra says the company will stay conservative. "We don't want to be a growth at all costs company. Even with this money, we're going to be very disciplined."
The long-term goal is clear enough. Asked about his favorite outcome, Salandra said: "Ringing the bell at Nasdaq."
Whether that happens depends on execution in markets where Respond.io remains a relative unknown. The acquisitions Salandra is pursuing could accelerate that timeline, or create integration headaches. The 30% profit margin gives the company room to absorb some mistakes.
Another well-capitalized AI company with global expansion ambitions
Contrast in capital efficiency between AI companies pursuing public markets
Logicity's Take
The 30% profit margin at 169% growth is the real headline here. Most Series B companies at this growth rate are burning cash aggressively. Respond.io's conversation-based pricing is a smart hedge against the AI automation wave that threatens per-seat SaaS models, but the acquisitions strategy carries risk. Integrating acquired teams while expanding into unfamiliar Western markets could strain a 200-person organization. Still, profitable growth buys time to make mistakes.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much did Respond.io raise in its Series B?
Respond.io raised $62.5 million in its Series B round, led by Camber Partners with participation from Endeavor Catalyst and existing investors.
What is Respond.io's annual recurring revenue?
The company reports $35 million in ARR, growing 169% year-over-year while maintaining a 30% profit margin.
How does Respond.io's pricing differ from competitors?
Unlike per-seat enterprise software, Respond.io charges based on conversation volume. This means revenue stays stable whether humans or AI agents handle customer messages.
Which regions is Respond.io targeting for expansion?
The company is focused on North America and Europe, where it currently earns only 20% of revenue but sees its fastest growth. CEO Salandra expects these to become the company's largest segments within two to three years.
What industries use Respond.io?
The platform serves "high-consideration" B2C businesses where customers need to talk before buying, including healthcare, automotive, retail, education, and travel. The sweet spot is companies with 200 to 10,000 employees.
Need Help Implementing This?
Evaluating conversational commerce platforms for your business? Logicity's research team can help you compare vendors, assess integration requirements, and model ROI. Contact us for a consultation.
Source: Startups | TechCrunch / Kate Park
Manaal Khan
Tech & Innovation Writer
Related Articles
Browse all
Robotaxi Companies Are Hiding How Often Humans Take the Wheel
Autonomous vehicle firms like Waymo and Tesla are under scrutiny for refusing to disclose how often remote operators step in to control their self-driving cars. A Senate investigation reveals major gaps in transparency, raising safety and accountability concerns.

Wisconsin Governor Throws a Wrench in Age Verification Plans
Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers has vetoed a bill that would have required residents to verify their age before accessing adult content online, citing concerns over privacy and data security. This move comes as several other states have already implemented similar age check requirements. The veto has significant implications for the future of online age verification.

Apple's App Store Empire Under Siege: The Battle for the Future of Tech
The long-running feud between Apple and Epic Games has reached a boiling point, with Apple preparing to take its case to the Supreme Court. The tech giant is fighting to maintain control over its App Store, while Epic Games is pushing for more freedom for developers. The outcome could have far-reaching implications for the entire tech industry.

Tesla's Remote Parking Feature: The Investigation That Didn't Quite Park Itself
The US auto safety regulators have closed their investigation into Tesla's remote parking feature, but what does this mean for the future of autonomous driving? We dive into the details of the investigation and what it reveals about the technology. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration found that crashes were rare and minor, but the investigation's closure doesn't necessarily mean the feature is completely safe.

